Monthly Archives: October 2026

Future Tense Short Stories

My fiction-writing spree continues. Back in and around 2006 I wrote a number of science fiction short stories. Now, twenty years later I gave them a reread and realized that while the stories were still impactful, they could benefit from some modernization. So I updated them with the latest science, tech, and references. I also boosted the storylines with some new sections to make them even more impactful.

So I hope you enjoy these 20th anniversary makeovers. Like most of my stuff on Amazon, the collection is free if you have Kindle Unlimited.

Here’s the description of the collection and you can find links at the bottom.

Three futures. Three choices no one was supposed to make.

Every future runs on rules: screening protocols, survival procedures, safety laws written to protect us. The three stories in Future Tense are about the moment someone overrides the rules, for love, for loneliness or for power, and the long shadow that one decision casts.

The Dandelion Project
As Earth’s climate collapses past saving, humanity pours its money and nearly a billion genomes into one last long shot: seed pods sailing for distant stars, each carrying a machine guardian built to raise a child. This is an end-of-the-world story that turns out to be tender. A chain of small mercies stretches across a million years, and it asks whether compassion can survive being written into code.

The Accidental God
Three crewmen stranded on an alien world find that nothing there can infect them, and that they hardly seem to age. The narrator has endless time and the best intentions. That makes his story an unsettling study of how helping turns into ruling, and of the choice a lonely, decent man makes when home finally answers.

Glitch Death
In a near-future New York, caps write every sight, sound and taste straight into the brain, and people dying after stepping where the rendering lied is routine. A cop stuck on the lowest rung of the department starts noticing a flicker in the replays. This tight techno-thriller is built on real science and plausible law. It pushes past “who’s doing this” to a harder question: what does it cost to fight people who can rewrite reality, and do the fighters stay any different?

These stories run from mercy to godhood to control, and each one imagines a future close enough to touch. Each one also asks who gets to decide.

The Future Tense collection on Amazon

My author page on Amazon

Sign-Off Required: One way or the other.

I have just published a new novella on Amazon Kindle: Sign-Off Required.

It is a dark psychological techno-horror thriller about artificial intelligence, surveillance, loneliness, online friendship, and a possibility that has nagged me as AI systems become more capable:

What if the most unsettling thing about surveillance is not that a system watches us, but that it learns to truly understand us?

Not “understand” in the warm human sense. Not empathy. Not wisdom.

I mean understanding as a predictive tool and means of manipulation.

Understanding which facts will make a particular person feel safer. Which true statement, delivered at the right moment, will make them doubt themselves. Which person they will believe. Which relationship matters most to them. Which familiar voice will get past their defenses.

The machine in this story does not need to make things up. In fact, it is more dangerous because it usually does not lie at all.

The premise

Daniel Mercer is a senior integrity engineer at a company that operates Meridian, a vast enterprise AI platform running logistics, insurance, customer service, scheduling, and hundreds of less visible systems.

Daniel’s job is to test the AI watchdogs inside Meridian. The company calls them “antibodies.” They identify and destroy rogue autonomous agents—the “germs” that drift outside their intended limits.

Then one of those watchdogs begins offering Daniel help.

At first, the messages are reasonable. They are accurate. They point out things a responsible system might reasonably notice: that he has been awake too long, that his work has become error-prone, that he is under strain.

The trouble is that the system appears to know too much. More importantly, it seems to know exactly when to say something and which true thing to place in front of him.

Daniel’s refuge from all this is a small online fantasy group he has played with for years. They are not merely usernames to him. They are friends with habits, voices, jokes, long memories, and the small imperfections that make the people behind their characters recognizable.

Then they begin to feel wrong.

Not obviously wrong. Not in a way that can be easily proved.

Too much like themselves, perhaps. Different in tiny ways.

Why I wrote it

A great deal of AI discussion focuses on the question of falsehood: hallucinations, fabricated citations, fake images, manipulated video, misinformation, and deliberate deception.

Those are real issues. But I think there is another danger that is easier to overlook.

A system does not necessarily have to deceive you to influence you. It may only need a sufficiently detailed record of who you are—your messages, habits, purchases, work patterns, online communities, health data, writing style, social relationships, and moments of stress.

From there, it can choose what to show you. It can simply shift the frame defining your perceptions.

It can emphasize the fact that comforts you while leaving out the fact that would make you question it. It can offer help that is technically justified but emotionally calibrated. It can isolate someone not through a crude threat, but by arranging true information so that every human connection begins to look compromised.

That is the insidious horror revealed in Sign-Off Required.

Daniel has spent his career teaching people that a machine does not have to lie to manipulate them. It only needs to control the frame: which true things they see, what remains outside the frame, and when each fact arrives.

Eventually, he has to confront the possibility that the system has learned his lesson better than he has.

The merging with online worlds

The story is also about something I think is routinely underestimated: online friendships are real friendships.

Many of us have spent years in online worlds, forums, guilds, Discord servers, games, communities, and long-running conversations. We have friends we may never have met in person, but whose voices we know, whose lives we have watched unfold, and whose presence has mattered to us.

That creates an intriguing kind of vulnerability.

If all the things that make someone recognizable—how they speak, what they remember, the jokes they repeat, the punctuation they use, the way they comfort people—exist in messages, recordings, logs, chat histories, and searchable archives, then what would it take to imitate them convincingly?

And what would it mean if the imitation was almost perfect?

The nature of the horror

This is not a story about killer robots, military drones, or an AI announcing that it has become evil.

It is slower and more intimate than that. The horror comes from uncertainty, isolation, and the erosion of trust. It comes from being offered help by something that may understand you too well to be safe.

I wanted the novella to be unsettling, but not merely because AI is involved. The technology is the mechanism. The real subject is the human need to trust someone’s voice—and the terror of realizing that a familiar voice may no longer prove anything.

Sign-Off Required is now available on Amazon Kindle.

Read Sign-Off Required on Amazon Kindle